730 Days Later, He Awakes

Tonight is the President’s 3rd State of the Union Speech and all indications are it will be an optimistic one, building upon various center-right moves the President has made to correct the course of America after 2 years adrift.  The question one must ask is, why did it take so long for the President to take proper actions?  And, if we want to wallow in the cynical (which I do, just for a few minutes), why did he let the American people suffer for so long before taking the obvious steps towards recovery?

We have plodded through 20 consecutive months of unemployment over 9%.  Related to this, we have had vast uncertainty over healthcare, regulation, taxes, and energy policy, all the while spending like drunken sailors (to compare Congress to drunken sailors is probably an insult to drunken sailors, but you get the idea).  The President spoke about the economy, but almost every action he has taken has hurt the economy and damaged the potential for recovery.  That is, until December of 2010.

The President will speak about the large challenges we have in front of us, but he will laud his administration for the progress he will exaggerate has been made.  He’ll talk about the auto industry’s recovery (based on policies initiated by President Bush) though it is still in question, he will cite the healthcare bill (positive effects have not been felt yet, though the negative ones have hit in spades) which he says saves money but he only counts 6 years of spending and 10 years of taxes to fund that spending.  He will talk about the stimulus, and here will be his biggest lie of the night.  This boondoggle cost the American people $850 billion for zero benefit, and the generation of huge long-term debt.

What I wonder, though, is whether he will speak about the fact that he had a bunch of disconnected academics in the White House for 2 years, fiddling with the economy but disdaining business all the while.  The anti-capitalist, profit-hating, and pro-big-government  left wing partisans who plunged our economy into deeper mud as they tested their classroom theories.

If he does so, he can claim some reasons for being optimistic about the future of the economy.  This is primarily because he has thrown out at least two key business haters from his administration, and replaced them with people who have operated in the real world and who know how to fix it.  Larry Summers is back at Harvard and the American people are finally safe from him and his socialist theories.  And Rahm Emanuel, the hyper-partisan, win-at-all-cost, horse-head-in-the-bed Chief of Staff is off to destroy Chicago if he can bribe or threaten his way onto the ballot there.

In their places?  William Daley, the former JP Morgan Chase executive, is the new White House Chief of Staff.  Yes, you read that right, a Wall Street banker!  Democrats, just imagine all of the BS (it’s a technical term) President Obama swayed you with over the last 3 years about Wall Street, only to hire in the most important White House job one of the very thieves who destroyed this country?  I jest of course, because William Daley seems to be an excellent choice, and his real world experience in the private sector gives us hope for positive action on the economy.

And then his next choice, Jeffrey Immelt, to replace Paul Volcker to run the President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.  A Washingtonian replaced by the General Electric CEO.  Now Democrats, don’t think too much about this one, because if you do you will really feel duped by the Anointed One.  I mean, GE destroyed the Hudson River (and still, according to Greenpeace, refuses to step up to their responsibilities in regards to this), and they are likely the largest producer of energy plants and equipment generating greenhouse gasses today. But for us pragmatists who operate in the real world, we are thrilled to have a real CEO running this council.  I know, couldn’t he have found a professor who teaches “The Physics of Wind Power” from Princeton or something?  I guess we’ll just have to settle for the GE CEO.

Add to this the President’s refusal to raise tax rates in December, and a Republican takeover of the House of Representatives in November, and you have reasons for optimism.

On the one hand we could ask, why did President Obama make so many millions suffer for the last two years before seriously focusing on our economic problems?  On the other hand, we can look forward rather than back, and hope that the President has learned his lessons and will continue making moves that get us down a path towards recovery.



This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to 730 Days Later, He Awakes

  1. Walter Witt says:

    You ask why Obama spent 2 years dragging our country into the ditch before he finally saw the light. It seems to me that he knew he had an unprecedented window of opportunity to pass some of the most liberal legislation since the FDR administration. The economy was not really in his top three. Now that he has done his damage and no longer has Congress in his pocket, he is repositioning himself as a centrist. After all elections are coming up in 20+ months and he needs to win back some of the independent voters to ensure he won’t be ousted by whichever Republican wonk survives the primary (whoever has the deepest pockets) fiasco. So he’ll concede to the Wall Street and big business crowd (who shifted their financial support significantly away from the Dems in the 2010 election) to win back their financial support. He’ll allow military trials for the Gitmo criminals to reasure the independent voters that he’s a pragmatist and not just a dogmatic liberal. These are easy concessions and won’t lose him any votes from his left wing base. But the leopard has not changed his spots. The Karl Marx philosphy was one step back ward to take two steps forward. Obama’s agenda is to propagate more of his left wing policies. He needs to survive another six years to keep his legislation from being reversed and to push through more. He will concede some cabinet positions and a few unpopular causes to hold onto his veto power and retain the bully pulpit until 2016.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s